Cost of War

Saturday, January 9, 2010

Right Wing Attention Spans are....Oh Look a Chicken!



“Folks’ attention spans are short.”

This is what Obama said after the "liberal media" bombarded his administration with claims of pivoting back and forth between health care and the job crisis.

“I think we have been successful in averting disaster,” Obama said on Dec. 16 about saving our quickly sinking ship, the U.S.S Economy. “You know, you don’t get a lot of credit for that, because nobody knows how bad it could have been.”

No credit indeed, Mr. President. Because apparently, by taking pride in helping ALL of the citizens of our country, you're a Nazi/Leftist/Bleeding Heart/Communist/Fascist/Socialist. (or whatever the hell that means)

We do seem to have short attention spans in this country. We forget a lot. Well, I take that back, you have to know something first to then be able to forget it. Let me tell you something I don't think you know.

This past week as we pressed onward into a new decade new cries from those who do nothing emerged complaining of injustice.
It was decided on Tuesday, Jan. 5, my birthday, that Obama and Democratic leaders from both houses would sit and decide on how to merge the two very different health bills that have emerged over the past year. Good deal, for Democrats. The Republicans weren't invited.

Now the Republicans are pissed. Really pissed. They are claiming that this is a violation of the Constitution. A blatant move by the Obama administration to continue on with their method of "closed door politics". Or they are just mad because Obama is a big fat copy cat. They have simply forgotten what happened, oh say...three years ago?

In 2007, when the Democrats took back control of Congress they began doing a sweeping look at Bush and all his bull. One instance in particular is when Bush was trying to pass a bill that would escalate the number of troops in Iraq and also a new defense budget of $481.4 billion -- an 11 percent boost from the previous year -- (this would put U.S. defense spending to levels not seen since the Reagan-era, another useless REPUBLICAN pres....NO DON'T LOOK HERE! OVER THERE!! A CHICKEN!!)
So Democrats wanted to talk about it. They wanted to discuss plunging ourselves further into debt (at that point $9 trillion) by funding and fighting a pointless war. Republicans were not going to have it. I simply googled "Republicans block debate+Iraq War" (the hyperlink is to the 1.2 million links about it)

Let's sum things up for those of you who are sitting there about to tune me out. The Republicans are behaving like crying, school yard bully hypocrites. Now before you say, "Well I remember this one time, this one Democrat, he did something!" Let's look at the situation as a whole. An entire sector of this country has been bamboozled by the right wing's cries of Communism and trampling on our Constitution.
When Democrats tried to stop the useless spending, killing of innocent Iraqi citizens and our American soldiers they were labeled as "unpatriotic" or "unamerican". However, now that they are trying to overhaul a broken healthcare system to STOP people from dying and that cost our country 16 percent of our GDP to fund, they are labeled as reckless and dangerous? What drugs are the Republicans taking, and what are they putting in the Kool-Aid they are serving to the American people?

Let's get to the truth. The Democrats have not closed any doors on the debate. Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-NV), on behalf of Sen. Blanche Lincoln (D-AR), made a request that ANY senators from ANY party proposing amendments to the health care bill should place the text of their amendments online. Immediately following Reid’s request, Sen. Mike Enzi (R-WY) went on the floor to object to the very transparency proposal they were complaining about...
Enzi said that, even though the bill appears to lead to a greater transparency from Obama and the Democrats, “we can also see ways that this can limit the ability for the minority to offer amendments.” Watch the madness for yourself.

So where were these "fiscal conservatives" and town hall patriots when Bush was erasing our civil liberties? Approving wire taps and no warrant searches? Apparently they did more than they ever told us...
Where were they when we were recklessly spending BILLIONS of dollars to fight a country that had nothing to do with the reasons we were told we were going to war? Osama Bin Laden is still alive...wasn't that the reason we went to war? Now the chickenhawks are wanting to go to war with Yemen? With whose money? Will the money come from the top 1 percent who pay no taxes?

Let me clarify, I have no problem with people being concerned with their country and what is going on. No problem at all. In fact I celebrate that and encourage it. Hell, they can even disagree with me provided they have the numbers and facts to back up everything they say. They know I will.
But when someone tells me that Glenn Beck is smart and reliable, a man who has dozens of web sites completely and solely based on pointing out his lies, I have to walk out of the room before I ram my head through a wall. Anyone who calls Beck, O'Reilly and Coulter journalists should be institutionalized. Or at least something with the suffix -alized on it.

We forget way too easily in this country. And it's NOT equally both sides, like the excuse makers like to say. The right is a side of deception. A side of hate speak and fear mongering.
I remember Clinton. I remember the mistakes he made. I also remember in 2000, Clinton's last year, his surplus amounted to $236 billion with a 10 year forecast of $5.6 trillion.

Many people have used the quote that, "the American eagle needs two wings to fly, a left one and a right one." I agree that there are two sides to every coin, because there are literally two sides to a coin. That being said, there is no room for a lack of attention. There is no room for memory lapses. We don't have time for the excuse, "oh that must have just slipped my mind". If you're senile, you shouldn't be making opinions.

Alright I'll stop there and go read a book. Keep fighting the good fight.


Sunday, January 3, 2010

The Alabama Prison Cells May Open, But Where is the Money, Riley?


Because of our countries economic situation, we now are faced with making some decisions. Some are simple decisions, like limiting our grocery bill or how much we spend on personal entertainment, but others, and most, are much more important decisions.
In my last post I talked about what we had to look forward to in 2010. We are trying to find money to support the plan for a new healthcare system, we are trying to find money to support the millions of Americans who have lost their jobs and now it looks we are trying to find millions of dollars to fund those who are not directly involved with society, but play a bigger part than we might like to think.
We are having to think about our prisons.
Many of you will look back earlier on this blog and see that I was involved in a profile project about a program based here in Alabama called the Alabama Prison Arts and Education Program. If you read it, you will see it's clear I have an invested interest in treating prisons the way they were designed. To educate and reintroduce inmates back into society.
In that essay I talked with some people from a victim's rights group whose overall attitude towards our inmates was one of intense hatred and a desire to have them suffer. To suffer the way they have been forced to suffer after being victimized. Completely understandable? Yes. Completely necessary? Maybe. Completely practical? No.
Alabama Commissioner of Corrections Richard Allen said that right now, with this year's available revenue of $412 million, he is $15 million short of what he needs. According to June 2009's Alabama Department of Corrections fiscal report, current costs are around $44 a day, per inmate. The daily inmate maintenance cost has increased at a rate $2.71 per year over the past five years. This can in part be blamed on the increasing cost of healthcare in our country. Go figure.
Nationally Alabama's prisons are the most crowded. Their 26,400 inmates put it operating at 191 percent of its designed capacity. These numbers mean it costs around $1.2 million a day to run Alabama's prisons.

Where does all this money go?
Personnel costs for 2008 were $172 million. They increased $13 million from the previous year, primarily because of an increase in staffing and the increase in the cost of health insurance and retirement.
In addition to the personnel costs, the prison's other major expenditures included inmate health costs (accounting for 21.6% or $88.9 million), utilities and communications (accounting for 4.7% or $19.3 million) and food and supplies for inmates (accounting for 4.7% or $19.4 million).
For some reason this seems, to me, to be a bigger problem than a plasma TV or an LCD one.

Cold hard truth
As I have admitted before, and will continue to admit, there are reasons for our justice system. There are and will always be people in our society who refuse to play by the rules. They are brought up in violence and in violence they shall remain.
But what about the others? Let's go back to the numbers.
In the Alabama Department of Corrections 2007 Annual Report, the top three prison sentences were two years (9.75 percent), three years (14.61 percent) and 15 years (10.40 percent). Bottom line, people are getting out of prison whether we like it or not.
What happens when they get out? Many inmates never find jobs and are forced to return to former lifestyles, which inevitably return them back to prison. Proof of this is found statistically when looking at our national recidivism rate which is at 67.5 percent. Canada's is 35 percent for men and 20 percent for women.
Halfway houses and advocacy groups in Alabama such as the Alabama Prison Project work to ease the transitions back into normal life, but all of them are underfunded and unappreciated by some.
In the 2008 fiscal report I found nothing about how much money was allocated by the federal or state government towards specifically inmate education. When I typed "education" into the find box I was taken to a tiny paragraph section talking about education and I found some numbers.
87 percent of all inmates entering prison do not have a high school diploma or GED. That comes out to about 18,379 individuals, 11,400 who are black.
I then saw that 9,040 inmates are enrolled in the Adult Basic Education program and last year the ADOC awarded 980 GEDs. I guess any inch is a step towards a mile.
$540,000 was awarded last year by the Department of Justice Prisoner Reentry Initiative, which according to the report was a, "Competitive grant funded under the President’s Prisoner Reentry Initiative to provide services and programs to facilitate inmates’ successful reintegration into society." Sounds like newspeak to me.
In 2007 we committed $647 billion to our defense budget. In 2007, the U.S. spent $2.26 trillion on health care, or $7,439 per person.
Now compare the $540,000 allocated by Bush for a prison "re-entry program" to how much he spent on protecting our, well I don't know what we are protecting ourselves against. But it seems we can't even protect Americans from other Americans!

Future of Alabama Prisons
The crowded prisons are also understaffed. The ratio of inmates to officers is 10 to 1, compared to 5 to 1 nationally.
Gov. Bob Riley, will present his budget proposals for fiscal 2011 in January, and we can only hope he has a better understanding of our prisons, not fueled by those making money off of them.
According to reports, Riley plans to close the gap by hiring new officers, but he said the prison system has managed to get by each year without prison closings or layoffs. We also have never faced an economy like this Riley. Wake up! Times are different!
Allen said the prison system's budget problems could be eased in two ways:
1. Alabama expand community corrections and drug court programs allowing offenders to stay at home and work while under close supervision rather than going to prison.
2. Judges started following the state's voluntary sentencing guidelines rather than giving sentences longer than those recommended.
Who is calling the shots in this state?
Remember, this is a country where the federal government spent over $19 billion dollars in 2003 on the "War on Drugs", at a rate of about $600 per second. According to the War on Drugs clock already, on Jan. 3, our federal government has spent $198.5 million on this never ending fight.

We may see the prison population drop for the first time in four decades. In 2008 the United States sat at 1.6 million state and federal inmates. This economic situation will be interesting. Already in Texas the parole rate, once at 15 percent has risen to 30 percent to get inmates out of prisons and back into society. In Mississippi, a sentencing law which once required drug offenders to serve 85 percent of their sentences, has already been reduced to less than 25 percent. In Mississippi!?

That being said, I will keep you updated on this process and what is going on in our state. What I will leave you with is a few questions. Knowing now the costs per inmate, per day, and knowing that we are $15 million short to house the people you are told to hate and judge, are you going to give? Are you going to write our president or your congressman and woman and demand they allocate more funds to keep these monsters behind bars?
No, probably not, because we are too busy making decisions ourselves. It's not your fault you are distracted. But now that you have read this and know the facts and hardships facing our state, what is your new responsibility.
I know that right now I am going to write a similar letter to President Obama saying the same things I have said to you. You cannot have it both ways. You cannot forget about these people and just expect them to be taken care of. You cannot demand justice and give nothing to help it. How much money are these victim's rights people donating to the ADOC? I cannot speak for them, but I can assume.

I am rambling now. I will keep you up to date.

Cheers

Friday, January 1, 2010

First Day of the Year/Decade and What's in Store?


Happy new year and decade to all of you.

I know that I am personally looking forward to the next 10 years. There is a wind of change blowing through this country, despite what those screaming on the television would have you believe.
We are thinking about something we rarely think about in this country, helping one another. We are learning that polarizing ourselves into the "haves" and "have nots" does not, and will never work.
Despite recently losing out on a chance to revolutionize our health care system to include millions of tax paying, hard working American comrades, we again took a knee and bowed down to big business and special interest groups.
However, we can be positive and realize that any accomplishment is better than nothing.

A Look at the Beginning
So this has been a crazy decade. The inheritance of a surplus, quickly turned into a deficit, and a failed war. "W" blew through the $5.6 trillion Clinton Surplus in one year in office. (did we everyday about Bush's first year? Nobody even asked questions. So much for the "Liberal Media".)

Bush reversed Clinton's policy of taxing those who make the most in our country at the expense of those who do not. He gave out $630 billion in tax cuts to the top 1 percent of income earners, his base as he called them.
The 2004 deficit reached $415 billion, a national record. The debt's real size was strategically covered up by the fact that Bush shifted $150 billion from the Social Security trust fund in order to make the shortfall look smaller.
He spent the surplus AND plunged the country into the biggest debt in its history.

So there is no denying that we are in it pretty deep here in the Divided States of America. We can only look forward to 2010 to be the year of understanding and acceptance of our failure as a nation. But where do we start?

Continuing the Fight We Didn't Even Want
President Obama made the move to continue the war in Afghanistan. Sending 30,000 more of our men and women, mothers and fathers and sons and daughters to die fighting an unjust and unconstitutional war that Bush forced us into.
I do not fault Obama with this. He is in a damned if you do, damned if you don't situation. If he chooses to bring the troops home then he faces the wrath of those who coined the term "cut and run Democrat". The pro-war people will fault him for his inability to "fight and protect the country." Saying that he is, "showing time after time that he sides with the enemy and has ties to terrorist organizations."
On the other side, his own side, they are tired of innocent people being killed and our servicemen and women serving extended tours away from the family and friends to fight an unknown enemy. They too are complaining. Calling Obama "Bush's Twin" for continuing the war
Lieberman, the neoconservative, private health insurance whore, who wanted to be the Secretary of Defense in the administration of John McCain, is proposing the launch of a new pre-emptive war on Yemen.

In a FOX News interview Lieberman said that Yemen is the next front for the American fight on terror. He is calling for the Obama administration to take the fight to them before they bring it to us. Sound familiar?

"Iraq was yesterday's war, Afghanistan is today's war. If we don't act preemptively, Yemen will be tomorrow's war."

Does it ever occur to Lieberman, who is also a Vietnam draft dodger, that because terrorism is not a person it cannot move from country to country. Terrorism is a tactic and you cannot declare war on a tactic. How have we, in our attempt to "liberate" the people of Iraq and Afghanistan, helped the resentment feelings our enemies have for us? Right now there are between 94,939 and 103,588 dead Iraqi civilians. Innocent people who had nothing to do with September 11th. Unless you have information that the CIA, the NSA and the rest of the world don't and know different, we are murderers.
I also want to comment on the attitude of these pro-war politicians. How many of them actually have loved ones fighting overseas. A USA Today article says, "at least nine members." Are the others lying and hiding their military children? No, they are just nestled away safely somewhere while we send the poor kids. Just like Vietnam where 76 percent of the men sent to Vietnam were from lower middle and working class backgrounds.
So when will Lieberman go to war? I find his championing of violence, despite a lack of military or combat experience, an absolute disgrace to our servicemen. A disgrace to the 5,293 fallen soldiers. The 5,239 soldiers that are dead after former Vice President Cheney said the Iraq and Afghanistan citizens would, "welcome us as liberators."

Ouch, I'm Hurt/Sick! Where is My Healthcare?
On Christmas Eve 2009, the Senate passed it's version of the healthcare reform bill. Devoid of any public option the bill passed the Senate with a 60-39 vote. They needed the 60 votes to bust the Republican filibuster. A filibuster to waste time while millions of American lives hung in the balance. Trusting their elected leaders to value their lives.

Harry Reid spoke in a Time magazine article.
"This morning isn't the end of the process, it's merely the beginning. We'll continue to build on this success to improve our health system even more ... But that process cannot begin unless we start today ... there may not be a next time."

The Senate version would ban the insurance industry from denying benefits or charging higher premiums on the basis of pre-existing medical conditions. In addition, Congressional Budget Office predicts the bill will help reduce the nation's deficits by $130 billion over the next 10 years, an estimate that puts faith in our lawmakers to carry stay honest and enforce the delivery of hundreds of billions of dollars in planned cuts to insurance companies, doctors, hospitals and others who treat Medicare patients.

Here is where it gets messy.

For the first time, the government would require nearly every American to carry insurance, and subsidies would be provided to help low-income people to do so. Employers would be induced to cover their employees through a combination of tax credits and penalties. It works the same way auto insurance works.
Here is the logic. You don't insure your car as you are plowing into the back of the little old lady in front of you who slammed on her breaks at the yellow light. You protect yourself before hand. You INSURE yourself that you will be protected.
The people complaining about being required to buy insurance should know, had they supported the public option, this never would have happened.
Wait, this just in, a voice from the past. Another president did this? Bush? (more on this later! It's juicy!)

The same goes for health insurance. We live in a country full of unhealthy people. Millions of these unhealthy people inevitably get sick or injured in some way and require treatment. Treatment they then cannot afford. So what happens? We, the few who can barely afford the premiums, averaging at $5,380, then have to cover for those who cannot pay. (currently 45 million Americans have no health care)
The public option and House bill, which people labeled as examples of fascism and socialism, would have forced the insurance companies, who do nothing but make solid money, to lower their skyrocketing premiums to compete with the government funded program.

(Note to FOX News, Obama cannot be BOTH a fascist AND a socialist. It is impossible. Look at Hitler, he hated the socialists and communists because he was a fascist. Look it up for God's sake.)

“The public option, whether we have it or we don’t have it, is not the entirety of health care reform,” the president said. “This is just one sliver of it, one aspect of it.”--President Obama

Obama is right. There is a big pie here, and we are arguing over the size of the pieces instead of fighting for the whole pie. (And who is cutting it!)

Democrats are there own worst enemies right now. All claim to be concerned about healthcare yet some threaten to vote against any version that lacks a public option, while conservative Democrats in both chambers promise they’ll oppose any version that contains one.
Obama has done well to stay above the insanity inside his Congress, but with elections coming up where Republicans may take back control, or at least gain significant seats, Democrats need to rally behind the reason they are there, the people.
Obama needs to be assertive here. He built his platform on promises of healthcare reform, and it needs to happen this year, NOT at the end of his presidency when he is worried about an election to win.

Wonder who paid for Rush's heart problems this past week?

Dude, Where's My Job?
Probably the major thing that the American people are waiting for words of good news on is the unemployment situation.
This past week, the number of recently laid-off workers filing for unemployment benefits dropped to the lowest level since July 2008. Something is happening.
As of November 2009, the national unemployment percentage still sits at 9.4 percent, 3.2 points lower than it was that time a year ago.
It seems that now the unemployment rates are functioning on a state level. We have Arkansas that has dropped to 7.4 and Florida that has risen to 11.5. I am no economist so I won't begin to speculate about this. I will venture a guess that it may be due to the types of jobs available. I say that because Michigan has one of the highest unemployment rates because of the failing auto industry jobs.
Yes, having a job will be a big concern for many Americans going into a new year and decade.
Obama can proudly argue that he has come through on a number of issues.
Most economists agree that the federal investments in banks helped us dodge an economic collapse and that the stimulus bill has hopefully slowed job losses.

Terrrrrror!
This past week, Umar Farouk Abdulmutallab, a Nigerian man working with Al Qaeda in Yemen, tried to detonate a device on a transatlantic flight in Detroit. Keyword was tried, thankfully the device failed before more innocent lives were shed.
That's good you say, we stopped him, right? Case closed. Not so fast.
FOX News and other criers have exploded the airwaves with claims that Obama knew about this attack and did nothing. That he was too busy in Hawaii, on vacation, relaxing to care about the state of the country.
Since this is a decade in review piece, let's travel back in time.
This link lays out minute by minute the EXACT actions that Bush took when he was told that the United States of America was under attack. An attack that DID result in the loss of innocent American lives, unlike the event that happened this past week.

Since most of you may not click the link, allow me to copy in an excerpt here. This is at the beginning of the day...

At approximately 8:48 a.m. on the morning of September 11, 2001, the first pictures of the burning World Trade Center were broadcast on live television.

9:03 a.m.—fifteen minutes after it was clear the United States was under terrorist attack, President Bush sat down with a classroom of second-graders and begin a 20-minute pre-planned photo op. No one knows the answer to that question. In fact, no one has even asked Bush about it.

As soon as this happened I wanted to write an article about it. Someone beat me to it and did a fantastic job here.
A Politico.com article sums it up nicely.

• Within the first four days, Obama addressed the nation twice. Bush didn’t speak about it until six days after the event and only addressed it after being asked about it in a meeting with reporters at his Texas ranch.

• The Obama administration quickly called the incident what it was: an attempted terrorist act. The Bush administration’s initial statements never included such a description.

One of the most interesting things to note is that in looking back, Politico.com could not find one instance in which the Democrats were on record criticizing Bush's response to 9/11. Thanks Dick Cheney!

So What Do We Have to Look Forward To?
As of right now, more bull I am afraid. We have a divided and strictly partisan Congress. One side is willing to bend, but will not break. The other side just wants to break, the rules. Republicans will continue to be the only party in history to exploit the filibuster. They will continue to cry and complain about being silenced in the Senate, even though they, McCain, did they same thing when they were bullying the country into war.
Right now we are in a position to just keep doing what we have been doing. A cycle of Republicans being elected, bankrupting the country, taking us to war, and then Democrats being voted in to clean stuff up, raising taxes, pissing Christians and "conservatives" off with their gay rights and abortion talk.

We have a chance to take the decade known as the "Uh Oh's" and turn them around.

I for one have hope in my country. Obama gave us hope and he will deliver. I know it.
Until then, we must renew our promise to be citizens of this country. To serve it and protect it. We are fighting an information war, and the enemy is not nearly as smart. We have the weapons of facts, and they use the weapon of fear.

Another president who was charged with rebuilding a nation said a long time ago, "The only thing we have to fear is fear it'self - nameless, unreasoning, unjustified, terror which paralyzes needed efforts to convert retreat into advance."

Let's get to work!

Thursday, December 24, 2009

Outside the Bars and Into the Mind: The Story of the Prison Arts and Education Program



In a world where captivity and nonconformity is suspect and creativity is suppressed, the ones being held behind the bars are looking for a release.

"Only you can make today the first day of the rest of your life."

This is one of the several signs that greet inmates and visitors as they walk down the blue and white, impersonal hallways leading to the control entrance at the St. Clair County Correctional Facility.

St. Clair is a maximum security prison to the northeast of Birmingham that holds more than 2,000 inmates behind its razor wire fences and guard towers. Close to 400 of those 2,000 inmates are men serving life sentences for violent crimes.

In the prison yard, men are herded like cattle to and from the gym, dining hall and their dormitories.

Considerate of outsiders some prisoners try to make small talk with visitors as they welcome them into their home, the prison.

Some prisoners sit, backs against walls, looking out into nothing.

However, inside the library classroom at St. Clair, the inmates there take on a different look. In a white room, walls lined with law books, the attitude seems different.

For two hours a week these inmates become students and are allowed to step outside of the bars and inside their own minds by becoming immersed in writing, drawing and reading classes.

"I get outside of a place I know I am never going to get out," says one of the inmates in the classroom. "When I read a book or draw a picture, I ain't me no more, I am somebody else."

These inmates are participating in a program called the Alabama Prison Arts and Education Program.

The APAEP is a program based at the Center for Arts and Humanities at Auburn University and has been funded since 2003 by the National Endowment for the Arts.

The program director, Kyes Stevens, said she never saw this opportunity coming.

Kyes was only just out of graduate school when a friend called and asked if she wanted to be a part of a new grant to teach literature classes at Talladega Federal Prison.

"At first I thought she was just BS'ing me," Kyes said, "I quickly learned just how serious she was."

Since then, this small grant program has grown to cover classes at 10 rotating facilities in the state.

Teachers for the program come from all across the state.

"All of our teachers love teaching in the prisons. Even if the program disappeared one day they would still want to do what they are doing. I think the education experience is unlike any other classroom experience you walk into," said Kyes.

According to 2007 statistics from the Alabama Department of Correction, coming into prison the average inmate's education level is at 10th grade. Eighty seven percent enter without a high school diploma, which comes out to 18,739 inmates. Out of those 18,739 inmates, 11,400 of them are black and 6,949 of them are white.

"There is an injustice in our education system," said an inmate at Staton Correctional Facility who was attending a literature class taught by Stevens. "It is just unfortunate because it seemed like nobody cared about me until I was already in prison. I am not using that as an excuse for anything that I have done, but it seems like folks are set up to fail."


A Cry From the Victims

Because there are inmates filling prison cells, it means also somewhere there are victims. There are groups dedicated to making sure that these victims are not forgotten.

"We did not ask to be victims. When did we agree to have our lives forever changed by this?"

This is from Miriam Shehane the director of the state organization VOCAL, or Victims of Crime and Leniency. The organization’s purpose is to ensure the equal and fair treatment of victims of violent crimes and their families.

Shehane, whose daughter was murdered in Birmingham 30 years ago, still holds onto the feeling of being victimized.

"It changes you forever. It has affected my other family relationships with my husband, my other children and my grandchildren."

Shehane said she believes too much thought is given to the well being and care of the inmates and the victims seem to get lost in the court process.

"I do believe that everybody should be given a high school education. We provide it for them for free. After that though, anything they receive should also be given to help the victim."

Shehane said it would not bother her so much if she didn't feel like there was always something being done for the inmate.

Shehane said she thinks the problems start in the court room.

"They sit and they say, 'well they haven't done any worse than the next person so why send them to jail?' "

The group, and its members, have their own views for what the sentencing process and prison time should be.

Christopher Peterson, director of the VOCAL Selma chapter, said, “Prison should be designed to punish people for violations of the rules of society.”

Peterson said he thinks that a person should serve all the time on their sentence meaning no parole and no probation.

Like Shehane, Peterson also believes in providing education to some extent. He said that a portion of the sentence should be punishment only and another portion should be dedicated to learning how to exist in society.

“Before being released, one must demonstrate that they have the desire and capacity to live in society and abide by the law.”

It's not about vengeance, said Shehane, it's about justice she feels the victims and their families never receive.

"Absolutely there is an injustice. There is an attitude that we are just supposed to be victimized.”

One of Shehane's biggest complaints is that there are no numbers, no statistics about the validity of the program. She asks to see the number of people who were reformed by the program.

"If we are going to just throw money at a program, I want to see if it's working."

Current statistics provided by the U.S Department of Justice shows the national average for recidivism, a relapse into criminal behavior, to be an estimated 67.5 percent. Those in that percentage were rearrested for a felony or serious misdemeanor within three years of their release.

When asked how many reformed inmates would indicate the education program was successful, Shehane said, "I don't really know, but I would hope more than a quarter."

Shehane said that she, and VOCAL, are not trying to take rights away from offenders, but simply demanding equal rights for the victims and their families.


A Mutual Understanding

Stevens said she knows that there are people who do not agree with what she is doing, and she has learned to accept that.

"Their fears are based on ideas of vindication. They honestly believe that all the people in prison are horrible, and that they should rot there. Yes, I agree there are some people who are just bad people, and they should stay locked up, but what the majority of people don't realize, or refuse to realize, is that majority of inmates are going to get out of prison."

According to 2007 ADOC statistics, the average sentence is almost 15 years, with the average time served at 4.75 years.

American prisons are now releasing more than 600,000 inmates a year, according to the American Public Media story, "Hard Time: Life After Prison", which tells the story of a man released from prison who struggles to find a job and rebuild his life.

During the 1960's alone the inmate population doubled and is now sitting at two million incarcerated individuals.

Stevens realizes these numbers. She sees a fraction of these faces weekly.

"I’m doing what I do because I believe in it. I used to just think I was doing the right thing, now I know I am doing the right thing."

Stevens said these misunderstandings and stereotypes are where the problems start. She says prison is not a delicate part of our society. It is a dark, uncomfortable thing to think about

Stevens said she respects the people who disagree with her. She accepts that people must agree to disagree, and says she has not made it her mission to “change peoples’ minds”.

However, she says there is still work to be done on the communication and dialogue front. She said she believes there needs to be a better foundation to the mutual relationship that is forming.

"We, both sides, agree what we are doing is the right way to do things. And that's fine. I'm not sitting here telling them they are wrong. I just do what I do because I know it's what's right for me."

This same vision of a mutual relationship is deep in the mind of William Cash, or "Cash" as he prefers to be called. Cash was incarcerated during Stevens’s first class she ever taught. He said he saw the program at its most unstructured level there, but knew that it was a step in the right direction.

Speaking directly about the program, Cash said that many people can benefit from that kind of intense educational experience.

"Being in prison allows oneself the time and space to dive into the educational process. On the outside, the distractions of life get in the way and you never learn to appreciate it, or even have the desire to go through the process."

Cash said it's hard to get everyone on board though. Many prisoners, he says, come into the program from different mindsets. Some come for simply a change in pace from everyday prison life. Some are seriously looking for any means provided to better themselves. But most come in unsure about what the program will do for them, he said.

"This program was a real freedom I was afforded. I saw it as a way to improve and better myself while serving my time. Just the dialogue offered is liberating, the safe environment in which to communicate about ideas and yourself is a gift in prison. You don’t get that kind of safety in prison much."

Since being out of prison, Cash describes himself as a success story. He now works managing three businesses and some 200 employees. He contributes his success and his new perspective on life to what he learned while he was in prison.

Cash said the program demands responsibility from its participants. It’s a responsibility that is forced onto inmates.

"Guys come in not really having a clue about themselves and that is what this program is about. It not only allows a dialogue with other students, but more importantly, a dialogue with yourself."

Cash says that the mutual relationship between both sides is the next piece of the puzzle.

"I can understand where groups like VOCAL are coming from, and I respect them. But they have to realize not all of us committed a violent crime. In fact, most of us have to get out and rebuild our lives at some point."

One former inmate, who chose to remain anonymous, feels resentment towards groups like VOCAL.

"Where were they to represent my daughter, my wife and my mother when I went to prison? My crime didn't have a corpse. My crime didn't have a rape victim. My family was the victim of my crime and who helped them when I went to prison?"

The inmate claims groups like VOCAL only work at one portion of the spectrum, a portion this inmate was not a part of.

However, both Cash and Stevens said feelings like these are not part of the next step that needs to be taken by the program. Stevens said to continue to fuel the animosity only further divides people from coming together to solve the bigger problem, which is stopping the victimization before it happens.


Where it All Stands Now

Standing inside her literature classroom at Staton Correctional Facility, Stevens tells the men, some of who have been with her for years, that funding for their class, a project of Big Read sponsored by the National Endowment for the Arts, is at risk to be cancelled.

"It's up to you to tell them that you need this," she tells them. "They need to hear from you that this program is worth saving. That there is a reason to fight for this class."

Some of the men go around the room telling stories of being skeptical of the class at first. Some told stories of never having been given a chance to go to school before and how this class had taught them the value of an education. Others tell about how this class had helped them begin college classes while incarcerated and the education they looked forward to upon release.

One student said, "The problem is that we are just getting this now. We already in prison and now we getting the chance to learn in a safe environment. For some folks it's too late, but for us, the ones in here, we care."

This is the fuel that drives Stevens every day.

"The fact that there are people longing, begging for this knowledge and to learn is what keeps me coming back. Changing one life, that is a success. When one person is released and then goes to college and makes something of his life, that's a success."

One of the students in her literature class at Staton is due to be released in June and hopes to continue with his college courses to become an engineer.

"We may not have thousands of people knocking down our doors to help teach," says Stevens, "but the ones we have now will tell you that this has been something that has changed their life forever. They want to come back year in and year out to teach these men and women. This is the mutual relationship we are working towards. This is the point where our program takes off."


The Alabama Prison Arts and Education Program is still growing. Its history is not old, but it is rich and meaningful. The stories of inmates, the books of poetry and drawings done by those serving time for crimes they have committed, are just the physical product of this program.

"It is a quality thing, not a quantity thing," says Cash. "It's about the change you spur to happen in peoples lives. That's where the beauty is, and it is beautiful to see that transformation in a guy."

What will the future hold for this program? Will the bridge of communication ever be completed between the two sides of thought? The future is not important to Stevens. She is too busy planning classes for the spring semester and putting teachers where they long to be, in prison, with the inmates who want to learn.

As long as there are people locked up, behind bars, Stevens doesn't mind freeing their minds, even if it is just for a few hours a week.


Wednesday, December 23, 2009

Alabama Congress Folks Do it Again. Flip-Flopping Galore for Christmas



Alabama has done it again. We have found a way to thrust ourselves into the national spotlight in a completely embarrassing way.

Yesterday, Democrat Representative Parker Griffith decided it would be better if he picked up a bat and began swinging for the other team. Did he get a promise for better pay? Reassurance of re-election for next year? Who knows. What we do know is he betrayed the people who elected him to do a job as they saw fit, not how he thought would help him down the road.

Look, let's just look past the fact that Griffith was elected in a district, the AL-5 District, that, according to a Huffington Post article, has elected a Republican twice since the Civil War and one of them was during the Reconstruction Era. He liked his odds as a Democrat I guess.
Many people are outraged at this obvious, and blatant, disrespect for our electoral system. Riding the popularity train into the turn around and fist you station.
However, the ones of us who have followed or researched Griffith are not very surprised by this act of flip-flopping during a pivotal moment during our nation's distress.
So this past Tuesday Parker Griffith announced that he's switching parties. He is saying he can no longer align himself, “with a party that continues to pursue legislation that is bad for our country, hurts our economy and drives us further and further into debt.”

So if it is unsafe to be a Democrat now, what was it back then Parker in 2006, during your time in the state legislature, or when you were campaigning for Congress, that made you sway to the left? Oh wait, there is no f***ing way it could be because the Republicans themselves used to be unpopular with the public? (Republican approval ratings during Senate Campaign) Say it isn't so Parker!

Let's take a look at how Griffith has voted in Congress.

Barack Obama's first bill he signed was the Lilly Ledbetter Act, which was amending the Civil Rights Act of 1964 in an effort to help advance the dream of equality in the work place, for a woman, underpaid for 19 years alongside her male coworkers.
Congressional Freshman Parker Griffith voted against it. And we didn't even haze him yet!

Griffith voted alongside Democrats 84 percent of the time. However he opposed Obama's first budget, the stimulus package, the climate bill and health care reform.
No surprise there.
It almost sounds like another "side swapper"...Ahh, I remember him, "Joltin Joe" Lieberman and his wife Hadassah Lieberman, who works for a major lobbying firm as its specialist on health insurance and pharmaceuticals.
"Haddy" previously worked as a consultant at drug companies such as Pfizer, Hoffmann-La Roche and ALCO Pharmacy. And her husband is working against public health care in support of private insurance? Wow. Really?
Anyways, back to Parker.
Most people were not surprised by the man who has a 7 percent progressive rating and a 33 percent conservative rating leaving to join his fellow Republicans.
Sadly for Griffith, the right are not that excited to see him come. Except for John McCain who is using Griffith as a campaign tool to bring more "conservative" Democrats, but does McCain really even know where he is?
Funny how this is the same forgetful John McCain who last week stood up in defiance as Democrat Senators insisted that each speaker be allowed only 10 minutes of time to speak in order to keep Republicans from filibustering crucial health care legislation. McCain called it an outrage never before seen in, "all his years of being in the Senate."
It was a valiant effort for the Maverick until Rachel Maddow called him out. She pulled up CSPAN footage (which someone had tried to erase parts of) and the transcript where he did the same thing to Minnesota Democrat Mark Dayton while Dayton was trying to protest the Iraq War.
Yeah, maybe he needs to pack up and head to Shady Acres.

So who, besides McCain, is even worrying about Griffith? Well known Conservative blogger of the site Red State, Erick Erickson, has already chastised him.
His quote below begins with something that is apparently not the English language, but please just bare with the poor guy.

"We should now hope him be an extremely endangered Republican in a primary. We will not fix the GOP’s problems if we keep allowing people who are not one of us to suddenly switch the letter next to their name and magically become one of us."

Dale Jackson, a radio commentator from Huntsville who has been given the name "the Rush Limbaugh of Huntsville", has not met this change with open arms. (Here is Jackon's "awesome" blog, which is now full of anti-Parker Griffith "stuff, enjoy!)

"He's a liar. Michael Steele should be ashamed of himself. The NRCC should be ashamed of itself for not coming out and immediately repudiating this guy. He was unacceptable a year ago and he's acceptable now?"

Bottom line, I say let Parker have his year of fun as a Republican. They don't even like him that much. What harm can he do?

I still find it interesting that a man who started the Huntsville Cancer Treatment Center and provided discounted or sometimes free care for patients without insurance, has suddenly joined the ranks of people wanting to bar these same people from getting the healthcare they as citizens deserve. Truly fascinating.

So where do we go from here? We are one Democrat down approaching the end of 2009. Should we be worried? The same thing happened during the "Republican Revolution" during 1994 when Clinton tried pushing healthcare reform.
What happened? Bush, happened.
Is a Republican congress in the works for the future? Maybe, but only time will tell.

However, what I do know is that for the first time in our nation's history, we are closer than ever to revising a broken system. A system that for decades has chosen who lives and dies in exchange for soaring profits in the private industry.
We may not have got the public option that would allow a competitive market that would force the insurance companies to lower their premiums or be run out of business, but what we do have is a start.